|
|
Post by D6 on Apr 30, 2020 11:42:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on May 3, 2020 17:51:03 GMT -5
Will 2020 be Aaron Rodgers’ last season with the Packers?
……………
IMHO, the sooner the Packers move on from Aaron Rodgers, the better for the Lions, Vikings, and Bears. It's not a given that Jordan Love will be a short term and/ or long term solution for the Packers. On the other hand, Aaron Rodgers is a near lock to be a first ballot HOFer. In addition, Rodgers is coming off season that he was a primary reason the Packers went from 6-9-1 in 2018 to 13-3 ( NFC Championship Game appearance.). Rodgers is still a differential player. He easily could still be in the 2021 season and he realistically will be in the 2022 season.
|
|
|
|
Post by frenchylions on Jan 25, 2021 13:15:23 GMT -5
Actually, Aaron Rodgers, in the footsteps of Stafford, might also asked to be traded, even with 3 years left with the Packers ?
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Jan 25, 2021 19:32:12 GMT -5
t's amazing that the Aaron Rodgers situation with the Packers went 360 degrees since early May 2020 and 180 degrees since prior to the Bucs upset win over the Packers in the 2020 season NFC Championship game.
The 2020 season was arguably Rodgers' best regular season yet. He seemed thrilled with Matt LaFleur's system, his Offensive Teammates, and the overall Packers team. Everything changed yesterday, in what was one of the worst officiated games yet. With countless non-calls for both teams.
More than anything, LaFleur deciding to try a FG instead of going for a TD in 4th and Goal from the 8 with the score Bucs 31-23, likely altered Aaron Rodgers opinion of LaFleur as a HC. While I think LaFleur should have put the ball in Rodgers hands in that 4th Down situation, all of the overt non-officiating calls probably impacted LaFleur's decision.
There's a realistic chance Aaron Rodgers will asked to be traded from the Packers. I think it's more likely than not the two parties will continue their football relationship for the 2021 season. Before yesterday, this wasn't even in question for months.
|
|
|
|
Post by frenchylions on Jan 26, 2021 7:36:22 GMT -5
"LaFleur deciding to try a FG instead of going for a TD in 4th and Goal from the 8"
Just before that questionable decision, Aaron Rodgers had enough green grass to run for a TD in the second and third downs ! Still don't know why he dismissed this option.
Concerning the first Bucc's interception, there is a clear holding call. Since all turnovers are automatically reviewed (as well as the entire play leading to that turnover), I really thought the officials would overturn this call !?
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Jan 26, 2021 13:58:00 GMT -5
At the very least, on the 3rd Down play at the Bucs 8 yard, the Packers would have been in better position on 4th Down if Aaron Rodgers attempted to run for a TD. He's taking plenty of heat for not attempting to run on that play.
Turnovers are indeed automatically reviewed. However, the holding component on a turnover isn't reviewable. I believe the only penalty that can be overturned by replay in the 2020 season is whether a team had more than 11 players on the field. That particular penalty was overturned late in the game, when it was determined using instant replay that the Packers had 12 men on the field on a play.
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Apr 29, 2021 14:05:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Apr 29, 2021 14:46:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Apr 30, 2021 13:36:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Jul 26, 2021 15:13:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by D6 on Jul 27, 2021 12:13:18 GMT -5
|
|
